I understand there are price different with knight tile and Van gogh, does it really worth to pay more for Van gogh? How much better is van gogh than knight tile? Thanks
In my opinion thats like comparing laminate to real wood. Im not a massive fan of knight tile plank, not saying it all looks crap but van gogh is miles better and worth the extra ££'s VG just looks and feels heaps better and the finish miles ahead compared to KT.
knight tile is dogshit, pay the extra for van gogh or go for a better product like distinctive/mflor, you have to pay for quality
what about van gogh compare to Amtico Spacia? I have never heard of distinctive/mflor, are the more expensive than van gogh?
Van Gogh in my opinion is one of the best Karndean tiles for what you will pay. I'm currently installing 40m2 of distinctive flooring signature collection which is a lovely product and priced around the same which is a m flor product but branded as distinctive for the U.K. Market. The surface emboss runs with the grain on this product for a lovely finish. Without sounding like a condescending person..... in any lvt you tend to find the more the cost the better the product
Personally I would go for Van Gogh over spacia, they look good when installed. The tile is slightly thicker but has the same wear layer as spacia
Distressed oak is a very popular one But there's a lot of choice in the range I'd say avoid the white oak but apart from that there's lots of nice colours All look really good
yes, distressed oak looks nice, I am going to order this sample to have a look, thanks. any other van gogh range you would recommend for an open plan kitchen/dining with 2 kids, one is 3 years old and one is 1 month old? thanks
Take a look online at www.distinctiveflooring.co.uk Italian collection Roma, Milano, Florence etc, worth ordering a few samples imo
